SOYLENT GREEN, Richard Fleischer (1973)

Why are we so scared about future? Why is it depicted so dark in films and literature? In which point Future started to be considered as something dreadful? Lately, as you may have noticed, I’m spending some time reviewing  sci-fi movies, especially old ones, or at least away from the digital and super special effects era, and it’s shocking  the way they all portrait society in the future, very pessimistic.

Right from the start, during the initial credits, Soylent Green is praising the past times, showing war as the seed for the current situation of a dehumanized society.

In 2022, New York actually has become a refugee camp. 40 million people live stuck up, deprived of basic human rights such as housing, running water and proper food, only affordable for the elite at huge rates. Moreover, the problem of greenhouse effect killing many people every single day. Soylent Green is the solution to face the shortage of essential supplies. These not very fancy looking green chunks provide proteins, calories and constituents enough for surviving, at a high cost, apparently  manufactured  with  the oceans weed.

William R. Simonson, one of the most relevant members of the Soylent society is brutally killed. Evidence indicates a case of burglary, however detective Thorn (Charlton Heston) suspects the bodyguard and the attractive mistress living with the victim, Shirl (Leigh Taylor-Young), are linked to the murder  and will start investigating. The more he will deepen into the case, the more stuff related to the Soylent Green origin will come out to the surface, an inconvenient truth society should not ever be aware of.

The story, based on the novel written by Harry Harrison, is absolutely fantastic, yet terrible. If you think of it (sorry, I’m not to spoil anything), we are so ignorant regarding so many things, if we knew the truth of many things, we wouldn’t be able to face reality. This reminds me of a 1984 sentence:  Ignorance is Strength.

Dictatorship, elite and extreme poverty are constant features which define Future. Investigation and development , communication and technologies,  do not contribute to a better world but just the opposite. The question is, if society tends to such status, why investing so much instead of trying to find a solution? OK, alternative sources to the current almost extinguished ones are one of the top priorities, but we all know that’s not enough. Economies are rotten, debt in many countries is a plague, so is the increasing  unemployment rate (situation here in Spain is absolutely devastating).

I feel curious about when human being identified future as something negative, away from the many advances we’ve been witnessing. Were old models of societies better than nowadays? Let me doubt it.


One Response to “SOYLENT GREEN, Richard Fleischer (1973)”

  1. Sorry for being so sharp in this review, the main aim was to express my thoughts regarding the way future is shown in arts in general.

    Unfortunately cannot extend in my review in a very detailed way, otherwise I could risk the end of the story, which is quite shocking and unforgettable.

    Soylent Green is a great story, pure sci-fi without special effects nor tools which could distract audience from the desperate situation and its consequences.

    Personally, the best moments are concentrated at the end of the movie. If you get the chance to watch it, you’ll understand.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: